The Supreme Court made its absolutely unsupportable judgment based upon several erroneous assumptions.
I feel compelled to write you concerning your editorial which endorsed the retention of all Supreme Court justices, including Rose Bird.
The piece by retired Justice Kaus manifests the wit and good sense for which he is well known to the bench and bar, if not to the general public.
Cruz Reynoso should understand something basic.
This letter is in reply to that of Peter M.
Columnist George F.
How will they police this? Peeking through keyholes? Battering rams?
So the Supreme Court has now sanctioned the imposition of the majority's morality on the rest of us.
When I read of the Supreme Court's ruling on homosexuality, I was so angry I was brought to tears.
My monogamous lover of three years and I (so much for the myth about all gays being promiscuous and spreading AIDS!)
Supreme Court justices up for confirmation, but also of the 14 justices of the Court of Appeal now serving on that court.
Former Gov.
Bird and the attempted politicization of the California Supreme Court (Letters, June 26).
Well, here I go again.
Your newspaper is to be congratulated on its objective reporting in the article, "Computers Churning Out Anti-Bird Letters to Press."
This is in response to the story in The Times (Dec. 8) about Rose Bird.
California Supreme Court Chief Justice Rose Bird and her vote-alike fellow Justices Joseph Grodin
Most of us want to live our lives in peace and security.
Now we have the Rehnquist court.
The following account of an opinion, written by Judge Antonin Scalia, appeared in Calendar (June 20), just three days after his nomination.