Thank you for printing George Will's expose of the Supreme Court's fanaticism on the abortion issue.
Court of Appeal on Tuesday ruled against a group of anti-incorporation activists who argued that the
I would like to lend my support to The Times editorial (Jan. 17) regarding the student-search decision created by U.S.
As a seeker of truth and justice, and as a student of the media, I must hereby assert myself to protest the abuse of the term "independence" by the judiciary and the media.
Christopher correctly observes that "Our state Constitution permits the people to vote on their judges, a right that surely recognizes that citizens can evaluate whether incumbents have been faithful to their responsibilities."
I appreciated the fine article by Warren Christopher about Justice Joseph Grodin.
I applaud your paper's (inevitably unpopular) stance.
Your editorial (Oct. 20), "Support for the Justices," broke this camel's back.
By holding that the Immigration and Naturalization Service was applying too tough a standard in deciding which refugees should be allowed to remain in this country, the U.S.
Your editorial and Conrad's depiction of the U.S.
Your editorial looked at the right evidence, but drew the wrong conclusion.
I share your sense of deep shame that Justices Rehnquist, Powell, White, O'Connor and Scalia dismissed the evidence that "relentlessly documents" racial bias in the imposition of capital punishment.
The clamor over the Supreme Court nomination of Robert H.
room over the last four years, a District of Columbia Superior Court investigation reported Monday.
Earlier this term the U.S.
I cannot agree more with the opinion stated by Warren Christopher.
Christopher Heard's article (Editorial Pages, Sept. 22) attempts to justify Gov.
I need some clarification of facts. In his article Heard defends Gov.
President Reagan plans to nominate J.
The U.S. Senate has gone on television, and the Republic survives.